Bryce Harper Philadelphia Phillies

Age: 27 (October 16, 1992) | 6' 3" | 220lbs. | Bats: Left OF-152 RF-152 DH-2 PH-4
Tm Lg YEAR G AB R H BB SO 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BA OBP SLG BB% SO% BABIP G/L/F % $4x4 $5x5
WAS A 2011 72 258 49 82 44 61 17 1 14 46 19 5 .318 .417 .554 15 20 .372 n/a
WAS AA 2011 0 129 14 33 15 26 7 1 3 12 7 2 .256 .329 .395 10 18 .294 n/a
WAS AFL 2011 25 93 17 31 11 22 6 2 6 26 4 1 .333 .404 .634 11 21 .385 n/a
WAS AAA 2012 21 74 8 18 9 14 4 1 1 3 1 1 .243 .325 .365 11 17 .288 n/a
WAS NL 2012 139 533 98 144 56 120 26 9 22 59 18 6 .270 .340 .477 9 20 .310 45/23/33 24 23
WAS A+ 2013 2 4 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 .500 .600 1.50 20 20 .500 n/a
WAS AA 2013 2 7 3 2 2 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 .286 .444 .571 22 33 .500 n/a
WAS NL 2013 118 424 71 116 61 94 24 3 20 58 11 4 .274 .368 .486 12 19 .306 47/20/33 23 21
WAS A+ 2014 2 4 3 3 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 .750 .833 1.50 33 0 .667 n/a
WAS AA 2014 3 10 4 6 3 1 1 0 3 7 2 2 .600 .692 1.60 23 8 .500 n/a
WAS NL 2014 100 352 41 96 38 104 10 2 13 32 2 2 .273 .344 .423 10 27 .352 44/22/35 13 12
WAS NL 2015 153 521 118 172 124 131 38 1 42 99 6 4 .330 .460 .649 19 20 .369 39/22/39 43 42
WAS NL 2016 147 506 84 123 108 117 24 2 24 86 21 10 .243 .373 .441 17 19 .264 40/17/42 25 23
WAS NL 2017 111 420 95 134 68 99 27 1 29 87 4 2 .319 .413 .595 14 20 .356 40/22/38 28 28
WAS NL 2018 159 550 103 137 130 169 34 0 34 100 13 3 .249 .393 .496 19 24 .289 40/22/38 29 28
PHI NL 2019 157 573 98 149 99 178 36 1 35 114 15 3 .260 .372 .510 15 26 .313 38/24/38 30 28
Career 8yrs 1084 3879 708 1071 684 1012 219 19 219 635 90 34 .276 .385 .512 15 22 .317 n/a
Welcome! You are invited to wander around and read all of the comments that have been posted here at Patton & Co., but as soon as you register you can see the bid limits that Alex, Peter and Mike propose for each player, and you can post your own comments. Registering is free, so please join us!
The final 2012 bid limits that were posted for this player: PK 5x5: $6
Alex Patton Alex
Dec 15 '12
Interesting thing about world series matchups. The last time both teams in a world series were making their 1st ever appearance was 1906! the 3rd ever series.

The only chance for that to happen again without expansion would be a Nationals/Mariners matchup.

The last time it came close to happening was 2001 when Arizona made the WS and Seattle the ALCS.
van wilhoite LVW
Oct 9 '12
From the AP recap of yesterday's game:

Nationals rookie Bryce Harper went 1 for 5 and struck out four times. He also was thrown out at third base on an ill-advised attempt to advance. He is 1 for 10 in the series with six strikeouts.

"Do I look overanxious? You think so?" he said to one reporter. "Maybe you should be a hitting coach."

It's a shame, really, that the baseball gods didn't arrange to have the Nationals play the Angels in the World Series.

A fair chance that it will happen someday.
Alex Patton Alex
Oct 9 '12
I know he's only 19; but making a foolish out at 3rd down by 4 runs late; guess he was too good as a youth to listen and learn you don't do that.
van wilhoite LVW
Oct 8 '12
I don't know mixed leagues, but in a single league I think Trout's as likely to be worth $45 as Harper is $35. The steals are just that valuable. He was worth more than $45 this year. Sure, it is possibly a peak, but even going down 15% of production, the extra ABs should help with the counting stats in making some of it back. Meanwhile, to earn a $10 profit on $25, Harper needs to improve by approximately 40%. From that view, Trout is the guy to keep at those prices.
Eugene Freedman EugeneFreed
Oct 5 '12
Good question, Texpope.

I don't think you could go wrong with either one at those prices, but I am a Harper guy. The power he showed near the end of the season was eye opening for a 19 year old. He was hitting shots that made Mike Morse proud. He went through an awful slump but worked through it, turned it around and played like a seasoned vet down the stretch for division winning team. He is playing at level way beyond his years for a team with the best record in the NL.

Trout is something special, but at the end of the day, from an ROI perspective, I give Harper the edge.
Keith Cromer Slyke
Oct 5 '12
So ... as a thought exercise.

Going into 2013, would you rather protect Trout at 35, or Harper at 25?
Phil Ponebshek Texpope
Oct 5 '12
That, 30 steals, and better defense.

But, BABIP data for hitters runs to a personal normal. Whereas for pitchers (except knuckleballers) it runs to a league normal. Guys like Jeter, Ichiro, Boggs, Gwynn always have high BABIP because of the way they hit balls and/or a speed component. Others always have low BABIP because of the way they hit balls. It will take 2-3 years to see if Trout was lucky (my expectation was he was lucky to the tune of anything over .350 BABIP) or Harper was unlucky (my guess is he was at or slightly below what will be come his normal).

It will be interesting to see how ZIPS projects them b/c they had almost identical G/L/F%. Maybe I'll ship the question over to Dan Szymborski for a column idea.
Eugene Freedman EugeneFreed
Oct 5 '12
For those who think BABIP is largely a function of luck: BABIP is the main difference between Harper's rookie year and Trout's.
Alex Patton Alex
Oct 5 '12
Comps through age 19 season on B-R.com. Not a ton of qualifiers:
George Davis (930) *
Mel Ott (928) *
Al Kaline (906) *
Ty Cobb (899) *
Buddy Lewis (892)
Paul Hines (880)
Phil Cavarretta (869)
Ed Kranepool (865)
Monte Ward (865) *
Bob Kennedy (849)
Eugene Freedman EugeneFreed
Oct 5 '12