| Tm | Lg | Year | G | AB | R | H | BB | SO | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | K/W | BABIP | G/L/F % | $4x4 | $5x5 |
| COL | NL | 2009 | 89 | 278 | 53 | 79 | 28 | 70 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 4 | .284 | .353 | .525 | 2.5 | .338 | n/a | 17 | 16 |
| COL | NL | 2010 | 145 | 587 | 111 | 197 | 40 | 135 | 34 | 9 | 34 | 117 | 26 | 8 | .336 | .376 | .598 | 3.4 | .390 | n/a | 52 | 45 |
| COL | AAA | 2011 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .300 | .300 | .300 | 0.0 | .300 | n/a | |||
| COL | NL | 2011 | 127 | 481 | 92 | 142 | 48 | 105 | 27 | 3 | 26 | 92 | 20 | 5 | .295 | .363 | .526 | 2.2 | .331 | 48/18/34 | 35 | 31 |
| COL | NL | 2012 | 135 | 518 | 89 | 157 | 56 | 115 | 31 | 5 | 22 | 85 | 20 | 5 | .303 | .371 | .510 | 2.1 | .354 | 49/22/29 | 33 | 30 |
| COL | NL | 2013 | 70 | 271 | 58 | 84 | 34 | 75 | 17 | 6 | 20 | 56 | 13 | 1 | .310 | .384 | .638 | 2.2 | .364 | 37/21/41 | 24 | 21 |
| Career | 6yrs | 651 | 2437 | 434 | 732 | 219 | 581 | 145 | 31 | 119 | 405 | 99 | 24 | .300 | .359 | .532 | 2.7 | .353 | ||||
| 32 comments | PK 5x5: $37 MF 5x5: $35 AP 4x4: $37 |
|
| Last season: 13 comments | ||
| This season: 9 comments | ||
|
Texpope Aug 28 '11
|
Following up ... pre/post AS break stats for 2011 to date: pre 318 AB 13 HR 51 RBI 14 SB .292 post 106 AB 11 HR 35 RBI 3 SB .302 The power is back. |
|
|
Texpope Jun 18 '11
|
Very quietly Cargo has brought himself back to being close to pace for break-even return on investment ... which is fine for the superstars we buy. But worth noting that career, Gonzalez has marked first half/second half splits: 1st half: 812 AB at .284/.329/.470 2nd half: 612 AB at .310/.364/.559 |
|
|
Texpope Apr 28 '11
|
Improve on 2011? What the hell - .336/34/26 ... even with Cargo declaring his 40x40 intentions, steady state (or even Patton's predicted 20% regression) would be plenty good. | |
|
Alex Apr 28 '11
|
A free swinger but such a lovely free swing it is. He'll come around. | |
|
yoda Apr 28 '11
|
It was nearly impossible for Cargo to improve upon 2011. He's a free swinger with a highly unsustainable BABIP and home/road splits. | |
|
MikeG Apr 26 '11
|
Terrible against LHP and on the road thus far. It's probably just an early season slump, but a $25 season might be more likely than a $40 season if pitchers have indeed discovered some weaknesses here. | |
|
Slyke Apr 26 '11
|
Is it too early to be worried? I have seen quite a few of his AB's this year, and he just seems too anxious. This seems like something that would have been addressed and corrected by now. 4 XBH's in his first 79 AB's would concern me, yes. | |
|
MikeG Mar 24 '11
|
Everyone nails it. The projections like Tristram's pitching even better than mine or Peter's, but his offense is kind of middle of the pack. 26 projected points for what Tristram spent on his offense is admirable, but some of that is Utley. Marcel has him projected for 446 AB and a 19/76/13 line. | |
|
Rotoman Mar 24 '11
|
Good point on the 4x4 prices displayed here. One that I should have taken into account of more than I have. The projections at onRoto are Tom Tango's Marcel the Monkey projections. Gianella and I rank one-two, with Cockcroft right behind. |
|
|
Toz Mar 24 '11
|
The problem, of course, is that Tristan spent $111 on his staff. I usually like my staff too when I spend that much on it. I don't know how much you can spend on a staff and still have a lot of associated risk. The prices are fine, but Chacin is a gamble, Cueto has the injury question, Broxton/Kuo could/should be the closer, but there are no guarantees (and I hate spending $5 on guys like Kuo in 5x5). Where it shows up is on the offense...the holes on offense are usually much harder to fix than the holes on a pitching staff...hence why splits are usually closer to 180/80 than they are 149/111. |
|
| 2010 season: 21 comments | ||
| 2009 season: 11 comments | ||
| 2008 season: 4 comments | ||
| 1 of 4 | next | ||
